Porn Theft

Posted by:

|

On:

|

I’ve been gone awhile. But while I was gone. I found two channels that I can recommend. I base my opinion on the quality of the film work and not necessarily the content. Those two channels are Andi Peacock and Red Queen. No idiot film techniques here. I have seen one episode on Red Queen that was suspect. I suspect it was one of their first episodes. I used to feel the same way about Camilla Creampie and Dante Diggz. However they seem to have hired film people who have compromised the quality of their videos. It is constant fact that sexy people and hot scenes don’t mix well with idiot film technique.

Now I’d like to introduce what I call Porn Theft. If you take a person from head to toe and divide that person in 4 sections or percentages. It could look like this: Head shot = 25%. Head shot down to waist = 50%. Head shot down to knees =75% and head to toe = 100%. All of these sections have stimulus connected to them. Any of these areas can be considered sexually attractive to someone. A film person never knows what is turning the viewer on. As a result a responsible film person will include as much stimulus as possible. Porn is fantasy and a person can’t fantasize if their view of what is turning them on is distracted or interrupted. A example would be going from a 75% view down to a 25% view. That my friend, in my book is Porn Theft. Now viewers have a tool to rate videos. Let’s say a PT Level of 1 is low or no PT. A level of 10 would be unwatchable. Red Queen and Andi Peacock are hovering around level 1. Camilla Creampie and Dante Diggz are sinking towards levels 4 and 5. We all have an opinion and they all matter. But if the video is filled with bad filming it is a substandard product.

Posted by

in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *